It is very likely that we are using the chapeau term ‘outrage’ for the three methods we typically deploy to express our disagreement with an event, a policy decision, an ideology or even a trend:
1) Outrage
2) Lynching
3) Angry lament
And then there is debate, of course, to the extent that is possible on social media
What sets outrage apart from the others is that it quickly moves ahead of the right vs wrong paradigm to suggestions, solutions and alternatives. Therefore outrage on social media has shown its rare power to galvanise emotion and action, to give everyone with internet the option to rally behind solutions of their choice, new pathways of their imagination.
It is for this reason that we need to allow outrage on social media to come of age.
And this can only happen if we allow ourselves to recognise that outrage is different from lynching,and these are both different from angry lament.
Of the above mentioned three methods of engaging with what we see as an issue worth a public debate, it is only the method of outrage that has the power to create positive transformation, because it provides actionable alternatives.
Social media's response to the Salman Khan episode falls in the category of angry lament, equally vociferous from opposite camps.
In the space of a few days Salman Khan has been called a messiah and an idiot, the Judiciary has been called names, and everyone with any means to buy the legitimate services or illegitimate favours of sundry institutions and/or persons has been foul mouthed.
Salman's supporters have been called morons. Some of his supporters have earned this title because they have called footpath dwellers dogs. Salman's lawyer has been called a spineless lucre lapping liar because he has defended such a client. Those supporting Salman on the basis of his charity work were snubbed saying responses to charity and crime cannot be mixed up as an alibi.
Some so called ‘outragers’ went to the extent of lampooning his family, and their near decrepit fortunes were it not for this pelvic thrusting mediocre money making machine of an actor called Salman Khan.
All this, knowing fully well that this angry lament will not produce any change in the issue at hand, nor is the lament designed to offer alternatives applicable in the present and in the limited scope of the episode.
If at all, any semblance of alternative solutions in the form of better road safety laws or homelessness etc were offered in the realm of the future and beyond the remit of the episode itself.
Contrast this angry lament with solution oriented outrage on issues such as netnuetrality, farmer suicides and land acquisition. And then there is the lynching on social media between those that think they understand Hinduism and everyone else:)
Comments