Skip to main content

Between wishful thinking and evidence

The HIV response in India finds itself at a crossroad – a choice between consolidating gains and frittering them away into a resurgence of the epidemic.
The struggle began when policy makers chose to ignore evidence and voices from the ground and almost announced the end of AIDS in India. Riding on the trend of fewer new HIV infections and disregarding all feedback from civil society frontline workers, the fourth phase of the government’s National AIDS Control Programme – NACP 4 – stated that the AIDS response will be integrated within the health system of India by the time the programme ends in 2017. By inference, a dedicated AIDS programme was no longer needed; and hence a fifth phase of the AIDS programme – NACP 5 – would be ruled out.

Not only does NACP 4 assume and affirm that it will achieve its results, but it goes a step further to declare that the entire government health system will thereafter be in complete readiness to deliver HIV prevention and care services.
Analysts fear that this naiveté may cost lives; this is a classic clash between evidence and wishful thinking.
Those who have analysed India’s ‘success’ in reducing new HIV infections will vouch for the fact that not only was the HIV programme birthed by civil society organisations, but the bulk of HIV prevention and care has been delivered outside the government’s health system. In the early days, the government acknowledged this and tailored a financial and administrative structure to harness the power of sex workers, men who have sex with men, transgenders, people who inject drugs and people living with HIV as lead actors in India’s HIV response.
Voices of protest grew louder more recently, when the Union Health Minister, on the heels of his controversial statements against sex education and condoms, said that HIV is like any other disease and hence it is only proper that it be treated as such within the Ministry.
The fallacy of the Minister’s assertion is deep. Sex workers, people who inject drugs, transgenders, and men who have sex with men are most vulnerable to HIV and most in need of support. These populations continue to live beneath the surface of society in shame and stigma. As lesser citizens in the eyes of the law, they harassed and punished into silence. To merely assume that members of these population groups will be able to access services at mainstream government facilities, just like anyone else, is facetious.
Forcing already marginalised populations to seek HIV prevention services from the mainstream health system will drive these groups underground and cause a resurgence of HIV infections. Only when marginalised populations remain equal partners in the HIV response can the gains be consolidated.
In response, the AIDS Momentum campaign was launched in Chennai recently. It is a nationwide campaign led by community-based organisations of marginalised communities bearing the brunt of the AIDS epidemic and engaged actively as leaders in providing prevention, care and support services to those at risk and living with the virus.
AIDS Momentum demands that the HIV programme continue until the job is done. In practical terms, this means a commitment to develop and implement NACP 5, extending current efforts for at least another five years after the current strategy – NACP 4 – winds up in 2017. Any move towards shrinking organisational and budget support to the AIDS response will lead to resurgence of the HIV epidemic in this country. India simply can’t afford to lose its momentum on AIDS.
First appeared in http://www.allianceindia.org/keeping-momentum-aids/ 
_________________________
AIDS Momentum is a campaign to protect and strengthen India’s HIV response. The campaign seeks to collaborate with the government to maintain and fully implement an effective and evidence-based HIV programme in India that will sustain and consolidate the gains achieved so far. A consortium of concerned stakeholder organisations, including Alliance India, are supporting this effort.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Debate That Is Breaking Up The Women's Movement Everywhere

Notions of sexual morality and decency can be divisive externalities in an otherwise value driven discussion on human rights.  Here is how. AmnestyInternational 's  call for decriminalisation of sexwork has yet again pried open the divisions between the women’s empowerment movements around the world. Abolitionists have long argued that sexwork is not only demeaning for women in and of itself, but worse, it leads to trafficking of women and girls and hence should be abolished. Sexworker movements, on the other hand, have hailed the Amnesty policy as a hard won victory. This is a  debate  where notions of morality and decency clash for primacy over justiciable Rights.  The beleagured battleground seems to be the sexworker's identity, her sexuality, her voice and her agency.  

Of Power and the Prayerful

Childhood fevers have a place of reverence in my memory ledger. They have created my template of good values and bad. They have taught me how to be cared for, and how to care – in that order. They have given my delirium a script and a meaning, place and purpose. These were not long bouts of debilitating illness. Just a few days of high pitched flaming fevers, sometimes from the burning sun, sometimes from prancing about in untimely rain; at other times, for unexplained reasons. In April 1979, a Hindu-Muslim riot broke out in the small town of Jamshedpur in eastern India, built around India’s first iron and steel industry. I was born and raised here. As all communal riots do, the reason was small and simple based on a sinister plan. It was a popular Hindu festival on that day; devotees were to gather in a procession which would go across the city carrying religious flags to celebrate. 

Smoking room

In the smoking room at the Delhi T3 this morning, I spot a man carrying a dark blue green bag, big enough to be small and comfortable. The man lit up after fiddling through the bag for all the tools needed for the vice. A laptop and other such items peeped thru in the process. I say, involuntarily, and against all better judgement, 'That is a lovely bag there!'. A confident thank you came back, and a smile as he patted the bag with obvious pride. 'Where did you get it from?' I persisted, hoping he would mention a Lajpat Nagar shop. 'Germany. Not too big, not too small, just right - has been with me for the past 5 years' I nod in hitherto unknown longing and appreciation. I did not take a photo of the bag because that would have drooled away my effort at seeming nonchalant about it all. I blame this uncharacteristic encounter on the impact that a friend's fetish for collecting bags has had on me in recent months - my delicate annoyance with it, ...