Skip to main content

The Draconian State and the Doctor

Dr Binayak Sen in police custody 
Suddenly the word 'draconian' has come alive for me. Dictionary meaning 'of or relating to Draco, 7th-century Athenian statesman and lawmaker, or his code of laws, which prescribed death for almost every offence'. 

 Dr Binayak Sen meets Draco, in 21st century India. Are they discussing judicial reform?

Does a bad judgement have no other reprimand than a better judgement on appeal in a higher court?

 In every job there are rewards and punishments, but seems like judges are beyond this framework! 

 A bad pilot can kill people and gets punished for it. A bad engineer can kill people and can be punished for it. 

 An incompetent judge (the competence of a judge includes his/her capaicty to maintain integrity) can kill people, can kill hope, can kill sanity, can kill justice, can kill dignity, can kill faith in human compassion, can kill the fundamental premise of democracy, can in fact waste everyone's time with reams of garbage which is thorughly tainted with everything other than justice....and yet, go fully unreprimanded by the system. What is 'honourable' about this?

All, and if any, reprimand is left to the mild mannered machinations of the motley bunch of people gathered under the label 'civil society' - a bunch that is therefore, by definition, outside all formal systems of governance. 

 FB is full of the likes of me in maroon rough cotton and kajal and carelessly torn jeans, doing their might - clicking for protest. Newspapers are trying not to be seen as ignoring the subject - though inches never seemed more precious. TV channels have given their newest and frailest cub reporters their first on-cam chance to report this story. 18th Century Jantar Mantar has no choice but to add its red voice to the protest gathering. And so on...

Why are judges in question wasting everyone's time? Aren't we a busy country, busy growing so we can beat China and still have 43% of our children malnourished? Binayak Sen knows a bit about these kids. Aren't we a busy country with no time for the tribals, but all the time and the machinery to gouge out their inners of all common wealth? Then why do we have the time for this mediocre judicial system that arrogates to itself the status of being beyond reprimand? Why the 'honour'?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gaza numbers

 Escape  Escape to where the mind does not count  To when a smile is in tune  To where mixing is matching  And forest sounds talk to river gurgles And numbers fade and flow and fly.   
Post a Comment
Read more

Leaving Home - a documentary on the Delhi based band, Indian Ocean

Its the story of 4 people who got together and did what people do when they truly 'get together' - they transform, they surmount, they deepen the depths and they find without setting out to discover, they sway dangerously knowing there is somewhere to lean and they risk for magic, they make reaching somehwere seem like a waste of time coz they constantly kick up their goalposts, they remain manic and mysterious till they come together and feed off each other's hungry creative souls and finally, together, they make sterling music.  I watched this documentary film last week at the premeir of its theater release. Its a rare one, not to be missed, by those who like music and films and those who want to watch a slice of contempoary indian life. This documnetary is showing in theaters in several cities in India and in New York.  Watch whether or not you know Indian Ocean or their music; coz you will most certainly find yrself and yr yearnings in the film; watch the film c...
Post a Comment
Read more
  A Critique of Randomised Control Trials in Poverty Alleviation Last week, Michael Kremer, Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo received the Nobel for Economics for "their experimental approach to alleviating global poverty” and for addressing “smaller, more manageable questions,” rather than big ideas. This experimental approach is based on so called Radomised Control Trials. Simply put, in such experiments, a randomly selected group of individuals (randomization is a method of removing bias) receive an intervention whose efficacy is being tested. Changes that result in the conditions of this random experiment group is compared with those in another ‘similar’ group of individuals (referred to as a ‘control group’) that was not provided the intervention. The difference in outcomes is directly attributed to the intervention. The RCT as a scientific research method is primarily widely practiced in clinical research to test the efficacy and safety of new pharmaceutical products/tr...
Post a Comment
Read more