Skip to main content

The Draconian State and the Doctor

Dr Binayak Sen in police custody 
Suddenly the word 'draconian' has come alive for me. Dictionary meaning 'of or relating to Draco, 7th-century Athenian statesman and lawmaker, or his code of laws, which prescribed death for almost every offence'. 

 Dr Binayak Sen meets Draco, in 21st century India. Are they discussing judicial reform?

Does a bad judgement have no other reprimand than a better judgement on appeal in a higher court?

 In every job there are rewards and punishments, but seems like judges are beyond this framework! 

 A bad pilot can kill people and gets punished for it. A bad engineer can kill people and can be punished for it. 

 An incompetent judge (the competence of a judge includes his/her capaicty to maintain integrity) can kill people, can kill hope, can kill sanity, can kill justice, can kill dignity, can kill faith in human compassion, can kill the fundamental premise of democracy, can in fact waste everyone's time with reams of garbage which is thorughly tainted with everything other than justice....and yet, go fully unreprimanded by the system. What is 'honourable' about this?

All, and if any, reprimand is left to the mild mannered machinations of the motley bunch of people gathered under the label 'civil society' - a bunch that is therefore, by definition, outside all formal systems of governance. 

 FB is full of the likes of me in maroon rough cotton and kajal and carelessly torn jeans, doing their might - clicking for protest. Newspapers are trying not to be seen as ignoring the subject - though inches never seemed more precious. TV channels have given their newest and frailest cub reporters their first on-cam chance to report this story. 18th Century Jantar Mantar has no choice but to add its red voice to the protest gathering. And so on...

Why are judges in question wasting everyone's time? Aren't we a busy country, busy growing so we can beat China and still have 43% of our children malnourished? Binayak Sen knows a bit about these kids. Aren't we a busy country with no time for the tribals, but all the time and the machinery to gouge out their inners of all common wealth? Then why do we have the time for this mediocre judicial system that arrogates to itself the status of being beyond reprimand? Why the 'honour'?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why call a blog by this name? 'Army of Lovers' ?

"Love," said Phaedrus, "is the oldest of Gods, and one of the most powerful. Give me an Army made up of lovers and I can conquer the world." The  Phaedrus  ( / ˈ f iː d r ə s / ;  Greek :  Φαῖδρος ), written by  Plato , is a dialogue between Plato's main  protagonist ,  Socrates , and  Phaedrus , an interlocutor in  several dialogues . The  Phaedrus  was presumably composed around 370 BC, around the same time as Plato's Republic  and  Symposium .   Although ostensibly about the topic of  love , the discussion in the dialogue revolves around the art of  rhetoric  and how it should be practiced, and dwells on subjects as diverse as  metempsychosis  (the Greek tradition of  reincarnation ) and  erotic love .
Post a Comment
Read more

A Debate That Is Breaking Up The Women's Movement Everywhere

Notions of sexual morality and decency can be divisive externalities in an otherwise value driven discussion on human rights.  Here is how. AmnestyInternational 's  call for decriminalisation of sexwork has yet again pried open the divisions between the women’s empowerment movements around the world. Abolitionists have long argued that sexwork is not only demeaning for women in and of itself, but worse, it leads to trafficking of women and girls and hence should be abolished. Sexworker movements, on the other hand, have hailed the Amnesty policy as a hard won victory. This is a  debate  where notions of morality and decency clash for primacy over justiciable Rights.  The beleagured battleground seems to be the sexworker's identity, her sexuality, her voice and her agency.  
2 comments
Read more

When a whole red-light area is burnt down, what does our conscience say?

On April 15 2008, sex workers' homes in Sitamarhi district in North Bihar were yet again targeted, attacked, and subsequently torched and looted. 12 sex workers and 4 children were brunt alive. Several other sex workers were taken away by the police, some of whom are still missing; several people were booked under the anti-trafficking act. The administration took no interest in protecting the basic citizenship rights of the displaced and victimized sex workers. The camp where the sex workers were housed in the interim did not have food and water, those burnt in the incident did not get access to proper medical care; several people died. Subsequently, after local groups advocated for their return to their dwelling under full administrative protection, the sex workers were allowed to go back to their burnt down homes – but without adequate food and medicine supplies and protection from further harassment. While the local administration is clearly not inclined to make any special...
Post a Comment
Read more