Skip to main content

SEX, DRUGS and DIGNITY - quick reflections


Since the early 1990's, the national AIDS response in India worked with the outlawed and almost won.

Those who inhabited this response, called it the ‘HIV movement of India’, now 25 years since it began a proud and reflective group of individuals and institutions. 

There is real fear that the low overall HIV prevalence rates cannot be sustained if the change makers lose steam. 

That condom use cannot continue to do the trick without dignity of those most at risk is evident to those privy to the process of change so far.

When the same National AIDS programme worked with pregnant women, it struggled for air.

The AIDS programme’s history is as much a history of institutions as it is of individuals habiting them. It is as much a history of change as it is a history of stagnation. 

It is as a much a history of new learning as it is a history of stoic denial of new thinking.

While the programme achieved higher and higher condom use among hard to reach populations, it almost failed to ensure that this change is sustained by the dignity of the condom users, the target groups.

It is time to come together again. All those who care and all those who matter, need to assemble again, this time to tug at the fundamental transformational question of dignity.

No national programme in india has had the great fortune of having the best and brightest in the country galvanise at all levels to respond in a way that can only be called a ‘movement’…heaving at its own velocity.

The HIV response threw up parallel movements – each almost more potent than the other.


Leadership developed and bloomed – individuals more than institutions grew to find ways of implementing new ideas and take the necessary risks, push personal and institutional boundaries.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why call a blog by this name? 'Army of Lovers' ?

"Love," said Phaedrus, "is the oldest of Gods, and one of the most powerful. Give me an Army made up of lovers and I can conquer the world." The  Phaedrus  ( / ˈ f iː d r ə s / ;  Greek :  Φαῖδρος ), written by  Plato , is a dialogue between Plato's main  protagonist ,  Socrates , and  Phaedrus , an interlocutor in  several dialogues . The  Phaedrus  was presumably composed around 370 BC, around the same time as Plato's Republic  and  Symposium .   Although ostensibly about the topic of  love , the discussion in the dialogue revolves around the art of  rhetoric  and how it should be practiced, and dwells on subjects as diverse as  metempsychosis  (the Greek tradition of  reincarnation ) and  erotic love .

When a whole red-light area is burnt down, what does our conscience say?

On April 15 2008, sex workers' homes in Sitamarhi district in North Bihar were yet again targeted, attacked, and subsequently torched and looted. 12 sex workers and 4 children were brunt alive. Several other sex workers were taken away by the police, some of whom are still missing; several people were booked under the anti-trafficking act. The administration took no interest in protecting the basic citizenship rights of the displaced and victimized sex workers. The camp where the sex workers were housed in the interim did not have food and water, those burnt in the incident did not get access to proper medical care; several people died. Subsequently, after local groups advocated for their return to their dwelling under full administrative protection, the sex workers were allowed to go back to their burnt down homes – but without adequate food and medicine supplies and protection from further harassment. While the local administration is clearly not inclined to make any special...

A Debate That Is Breaking Up The Women's Movement Everywhere

Notions of sexual morality and decency can be divisive externalities in an otherwise value driven discussion on human rights.  Here is how. AmnestyInternational 's  call for decriminalisation of sexwork has yet again pried open the divisions between the women’s empowerment movements around the world. Abolitionists have long argued that sexwork is not only demeaning for women in and of itself, but worse, it leads to trafficking of women and girls and hence should be abolished. Sexworker movements, on the other hand, have hailed the Amnesty policy as a hard won victory. This is a  debate  where notions of morality and decency clash for primacy over justiciable Rights.  The beleagured battleground seems to be the sexworker's identity, her sexuality, her voice and her agency.