Farmers dont want to farm?

The whole lame and twisted logic to now defend the fundamentally undemocratic process of snatching farmers' land without their consent and without a social impact assessment is to say that a majority of respondents in a CSDS survey would rather not farm under the current conditions.

Instead of exploiting this telling piece of data for serving corporate interest, the Govt could have asked the following questions to try and address the real issues at hand

1- Would the farmers have said that they would continue to farm if their produce got a fair price?
2- Would the farmers have said they would continue to farm if they had better access to irrigation, electricity and technology?
3- Would those farmers who want to leave farming despite the provision of these conditions, want to retain their land as assets? Or would they be happy to have their land snatched away in the name of the greater good (an undefined, unquantified phrase) of the country?

Comments

Of Power and the Prayerful

Childhood fevers have a place of reverence in my memory ledger. They have created my template of good values and bad. They have taught me how to be cared for, and how to care – in that order. They have given my delirium a script and a meaning, place and purpose. These were not long bouts of debilitating illness. Just a few days of high pitched flaming fevers, sometimes from the burning sun, sometimes from prancing about in untimely rain; at other times, for unexplained reasons. In April 1979, a Hindu-Muslim riot broke out in the small town of Jamshedpur in eastern India, built around India’s first iron and steel industry. I was born and raised here. As all communal riots do, the reason was small and simple based on a sinister plan. It was a popular Hindu festival on that day; devotees were to gather in a procession which would go across the city carrying religious flags to celebrate.

A Debate That Is Breaking Up The Women's Movement Everywhere

Notions of sexual morality and decency can be divisive externalities in an otherwise value driven discussion on human rights. Here is how. AmnestyInternational 's call for decriminalisation of sexwork has yet again pried open the divisions between the women’s empowerment movements around the world. Abolitionists have long argued that sexwork is not only demeaning for women in and of itself, but worse, it leads to trafficking of women and girls and hence should be abolished. Sexworker movements, on the other hand, have hailed the Amnesty policy as a hard won victory. This is a debate where notions of morality and decency clash for primacy over justiciable Rights. The beleagured battleground seems to be the sexworker's identity, her sexuality, her voice and her agency.

Between a Forest and a Laptop

This is Ruchika holding up her class 6 project on 'water conservation' which got the highest marks in her class. Encouraged by this victory, she has since made projects on topics such as dances of India, health benefits of sports and types of food. She walks into the living room, where I also have my work desk, and announces the topic of her latest project, saying "Mujhey information nikaal ke do (Please pull out the information for me) ". She starts the conversation with a half apologetic smile and an already-victorious glint in eye. And within minutes, as the google search throws up stuff, her face turns intent, her eyes flit across the screen with an urgency and speed as though if she were not fast enough all this information may just go away out of her reach, never to return. Then she selects what she finds useful. Takes a print of a funny illustration and laughs out loud. Then she puts her finger on the screen on a word she can neither pronounce nor ...

'People-work'

Search This Blog